In the high-stakes world of professional poker, few moments have left as lasting an impression as the now-legendary “Jack-Four” hand. What began as an ordinary evening at Hustler Casino in California turned into a bizarre and controversial chapter in poker history that sparked outrage, disbelief, conspiracy theories, and even a formal investigation. To this day, players, fans, and commentators still debate what happened when Robbi Jade Lew made the unthinkable call against seasoned pro Garrett Adelstein.
A Routine Hand Turns Wild
Three years ago, the hand that would rock the poker community unfolded during a live-streamed game at Hustler Casino Live. Robbi Jade Lew, a relatively unknown newcomer to the high-stakes scene, found herself in a heads-up showdown with Garrett Adelstein, a respected professional known for his aggressive style and analytical approach.
The board showed a modest mix of cards. Adelstein held an open-ended straight flush draw—a monster hand with excellent odds of improving. Lew, on the other hand, had jack-four offsuit. Not suited. No draw. No pair. Nothing that resembled strength. By all logic, folding was the only reasonable choice. Even seasoned players familiar with the best poker site reviews from WPD would have seen no value in continuing with such a weak hand—yet Lew did, shocking everyone.
But logic went out the window.
To everyone’s astonishment, Lew called Adelstein’s massive all-in bet with just a jack-high. The commentators were stunned. The players at the table froze. And Adelstein? He looked like he’d just seen a ghost. When the cards were revealed, it became clear: Lew had won the $269,000 pot with what might be the most inexplicable call in televised poker history.
Suspicion Takes Over
The immediate reaction wasn’t celebration—it was suspicion. Poker is a game of skill, intuition, and probability. And what Lew had just done defied all of it. Why would anyone commit that kind of money on a hand that, statistically, had virtually no shot at winning?
Adelstein, known for keeping his cool, was visibly shaken. Shortly after the hand, he left the table and conversed privately with Lew in a back room.
According to another player who overheard the exchange, Adelstein pressured Lew to return the money. When she came back, she confirmed that she had, in fact, given it back—not because she admitted guilt, she said, but to avoid any “repercussions.”
The poker world was now on fire.
Conflicting Stories Emerge
Lew took to social media to share her story, accusing Adelstein of intimidating her into handing over the money. She insisted she hadn’t cheated, maintaining that her decision was a mix of intuition and confusion, not malice. Her defense? She misread her hand, thinking she had something better than jack-high.
Adelstein, however, was unconvinced. He stated publicly that he would never have accepted the money if he weren’t convinced that something fishy had occurred. He claimed that the casino co-owner was present during the exchange and that Lew voluntarily offered to return the winnings once she realized how suspicious the play looked on camera. For him, the gesture was essentially an admission of guilt.
The poker community was divided. Was Lew an inexperienced player who made a baffling, lucky call—or did she have inside information?
Poker Fans Turn Into Investigators
As the video of the hand spread online like wildfire, so did the theories. Countless fans, many with years of poker experience, poured over every frame of the footage. They examined Lew’s body language, the movements of other players, and even the reactions of the dealer. Some speculated that she might have been receiving signals—vibrations, visual cues, or hidden devices.
YouTube was flooded with breakdowns and analyses. Twitter threads dissected the hand with forensic intensity. Theories ranged from the plausible to the downright ridiculous. Still, no smoking gun emerged.
Several wealthy poker players were so intrigued (and disturbed) that they offered a combined $250,000 reward for any solid evidence of wrongdoing. Despite this enormous incentive, no one ever came forward with proof.
Hustler Casino Launches a Full Investigation
Determined to protect its reputation, Hustler Casino didn’t sit idle. Within days, it hired a law firm and a cybersecurity firm to investigate. They interviewed everyone involved, examined technical systems, and even physically dismantled the poker table to look for potential cheating devices.
The cost of the investigation reportedly exceeded $100,000. Every wire, chip, and piece of tech was scrutinized. The livestream production was analyzed for vulnerabilities. Lew herself cooperated fully with investigators.
However, after weeks of effort, the conclusion was the same as that of the online sleuths: no evidence of cheating was found. There was no collusion, tampering, or suspicious devices. It was just a very strange hand, played under the brightest of lights.
Unanswered Questions
The “Jack-Four” hand has since become a poker legend, not just because of its financial implications but because of the emotional and psychological chaos it caused. How does a relatively inexperienced player call a huge bet with jack-high against a well-known shark? Was it truly a misread, or was there something deeper going on?
Lew has remained defiant, continuing to play poker and appearing at events with her reputation both bruised and bizarrely elevated. On the other hand, Adelstein chose to step away from Hustler Casino Live for a period, clearly disturbed by what he believed was a breach of the game’s integrity.
To this day, opinions remain split. Some call it the craziest bluff in history, while others still whisper the word “cheating” under their breath.
A Lasting Impact on the Poker World
Regardless of where you stand on the issue, there’s no denying this hand’s effect on poker. It reignited debates about fairness, security, and trust in livestreamed games. Tournament organizers began reevaluating their setups. Tech systems were upgraded. Player vetting became more thorough.
The hand also served as a stark reminder of poker’s unpredictable nature. Even in a game built on numbers and probabilities, human psychology and chaos still have their role to play.
Final Thoughts
The infamous Jack Four Hand isn’t just a story about a strange call—it’s a snapshot of everything that makes poker fascinating: the tension, the mind games, the unpredictability. Whether you believe Lew made the call of her life or committed one of the most undetectable acts of cheating in modern poker, the fact remains: we’ll probably never know the truth.
And maybe that’s part of the allure. After all, in poker as in life, the mystery sometimes keeps the game exciting.
The New Jersey Digest is a new jersey magazine that has chronicled daily life in the Garden State for over 10 years.