Ethereum’s green makeover cut its energy use by over 99%, but that doesn’t mean your wallet or the planet can rest easy. The Merge changed crypto’s carbon footprint forever. The question is: what happens next?
Ethereum’s shift to proof-of-stake wasn’t just a technical milestone. It was a full-scale energy revolution.
The 2022 “Merge” replaced mining with staking and sent electricity consumption plunging by more than 99%. But you still pay gas fees even now, volatility hasn’t vanished and global markets like the price of Ethereum remain unpredictable. The changes matter, but they’re more complex than a simple good-news story.
The Merge: Cleaner Code, Same Congestion
The results were immediate when Ethereum switched off its energy-hungry mining machines. Estimates cited by The Verge placed the network’s annual electricity use down from roughly 23 million megawatt-hours to about 2,600 megawatt-hours, a cut of around 99.9 %.
Binance Research has echoed similar figures, noting that Ethereum’s post-Merge energy demand is roughly 99.99 % lower than before.
That shift turned Ethereum from one of the most power-hungry blockchains into one of the most efficient.
Estimates cited by researchers at the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance suggest emissions plunged from about 27 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent before the Merger to just a few thousand tonnes afterward, a cut greater than most countries have achieved in decades.
Yet the Merger didn’t erase every issue. Network demand still dictates fees; when congestion hits, you can feel it directly in your wallet.
Why Energy Efficiency Doesn’t Equal Lower Fees
If you’ve ever tried sending ETH during a busy period, you know how unpredictable fees can be. Ethereum now handles roughly 1.5 to 1.7 million transactions daily, with around 400,000 to 600,000 unique active wallets.
When demand spikes, like during NFT drops or token launches, transaction costs can jump from a few cents for simple transfers to a few dollars for complex smart-contract interactions.
The reason isn’t energy, it’s traffic. Proof-of-stake removed the power waste but not the competition for block space. So while the network now uses the energy footprint of a small data center instead of a nation, congestion remains the price of popularity.
Still, the lower energy demand creates a long-term advantage. With less power burned, Ethereum’s validators operate more efficiently and developers can scale without facing the same climate backlash that dogged proof-of-work systems.
Volatility, Energy and the Price of Ethereum
Energy and emotion still drive the market. In a recent analysis, Binance Research noted, “The total crypto market cap lost more than US$300B this week, falling to US$3.7T towards the end of the week. Riskier assets like altcoins fell the most, with Ethereum falling over 13% and Solana by 20%. BNB fell only by ~3% while BTC slipped ~6%.”
That sell-off had little to do with emissions or energy use, but it shows how sentiment around sustainability, regulation and tech adoption feeds into performance. The price of Ethereum still moves in lockstep with broader risk appetite.
When investors see greener networks as future-proof, confidence rises; when markets tighten, even the cleanest blockchain feels the chill.
Volatility isn’t gone, either. Binance Research also highlighted that “Although volatility traders may see continued calm next month, as seasonal statistics show October and November are historically the two months with the lowest Bitcoin volatility, for price action traders, October is also known for reversing September’s weakness.” For Ethereum, that could translate into calmer short-term moves, but the underlying trend still depends on how the network manages scale and sustainability.
The Environmental Ledger: A New Kind of Responsibility
Ethereum’s post-Merge carbon footprint has dropped to roughly 2.8 kilotonnes of CO₂ annually, making it one of the most energy-efficient major blockchains today. Yet the network’s historical emissions still matter: before the Merge, Ethereum produced an estimated 27 million tonnes of CO₂ annually.
The Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance analysts have referred to the Merge as the single largest decarbonization event in digital history, but again, with the clarification that legacy emissions continue to be a part of the blockchain’s environmental story.
To put it in human terms, before the Merge, a single Ethereum transaction could generate roughly 110 kilograms of CO₂, equivalent to about a week’s electricity for an average household. After the transition to Proof-of-Stake, analyses by EY estimate that per-transaction emissions fell to around 0.01 kilograms.
The improvement is dramatic but doesn’t make the network carbon-neutral; it simply makes it vastly more efficient.
This new responsibility is cultural as much as technical. The crypto industry faces a different challenge: maintaining transparency and accountability as it scales sustainably.
The Next Frontier: Scale Without Sacrifice
Ethereum’s next big move is performance, not power. Layer-2 technologies, such as rollups and sharding, enable faster transaction processing without increasing energy consumption and developers are concentrating on this.
Binance analysts note that future upgrades through 2026 might significantly decrease congestion, making per-user spending on transaction fees and green footprint cut significantly.
If that vision succeeds, it could turn Ethereum into a model for responsible innovation that is fast, affordable and sustainable. But if network activity keeps rising faster than upgrades can handle, users may still see high fees and temporary congestion spikes. The balance between growth and efficiency remains delicate.
The New Jersey Digest is a new jersey magazine that has chronicled daily life in the Garden State for over 10 years.