NJ Lawmakers Consider Banning Gas-Powered Leaf Blowers

by Staff

Last week, lawmakers in Trenton discussed the potential ban. Towns and states, including Montclair, NJ, have taken steps to curb the use of gas-powered leaf blowers as recently as 2023, citing their contribution to noise pollution and emissions. However, the landscaping industry and some residents are pushing back, arguing that battery-powered alternatives are costlier and less effective.

In New Jersey, where the debate has reached a legal standoff, the state Senate recently advanced a bill to ban most gasoline-powered blowers for much of the year, allowing limited use during peak seasons. This compromise attempts to balance environmental goals with the industry’s operational needs, particularly in managing the state’s abundant autumn foliage.

President Rich Goldstein of the New Jersey Landscape Contractors Association emphasized the practical challenges posed by the proposed shift. He pointed out that New Jersey’s climate demands robust equipment capable of handling substantial leaf cleanup each fall. Moreover, the industry contends that battery-powered blowers, while cleaner, fail to match the power and efficiency of their gasoline counterparts, especially in demanding conditions.

The push to phase out gasoline leaf blowers is not unique to New Jersey. California, Washington, D.C., and several other cities have already implemented bans or restrictions. Environmental advocates highlight the pollution generated by gasoline blowers, equating their emissions to that of driving a car over a thousand miles per hour of use. Such concerns have galvanized support for legislative measures aimed at reducing their impact.


Yet, resistance persists. Critics argue that the transition to battery-powered equipment entails significant financial burdens and logistical challenges. Landscapers with substantial investments in gasoline-powered machinery face the prospect of costly upgrades or replacements. Moreover, practical limitations, such as the need to retrofit vehicles for battery charging, further complicate the transition.

Mayor Nancy Adams of Maplewood, NJ, a proponent of the ban, underscored the urgency of addressing climate change and reducing fossil fuel consumption. She emphasized the long-term benefits of transitioning to cleaner technologies despite the initial hurdles businesses face.

As the debate rages on, stakeholders on both sides continue to seek common ground. Proposals for financial assistance to help defray the costs of transitioning to battery-powered equipment have been put forward, aiming to support affected businesses in making the shift.

The battle over leaf blowers exemplifies the complex interplay between environmental policy, economic interests, and practical considerations. While the move towards greener alternatives is driven by environmental imperatives, its implementation remains fraught with challenges and resistance from industry stakeholders. The outcome in New Jersey and elsewhere will likely shape future environmental regulations and the landscape maintenance industry for years to come.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment

Yes, I would like to receive emails from The Digest Online. Sign me up!

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: New Jersey Digest. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact